|
They take an unconsciously deterministic
view of events. They take it for granted that some things
just can’t and won’t happen; for example, "oil prices
won’t collapse," or "the Cold War can’t ever
end." Not having tried to foresee surprising events,
they are at a loss for ways to act when upheaval continues.
They create blind spots for themselves.Scenarios are a
tool for helping us to take a long view in a world of
great uncertainty. The name comes from the theatrical
term "scenario"- the script for a film or a
play. Scenarios are stories about the way the world might
turn out tomorrow, stories that can help us recognize
and adapt to changing aspects of our present environment.
They form a method for articulating the different pathways
that might exist for you tomorrow, and finding your appropriate
movements down each of those possible paths. Scenario
planning is about making choices today with an
understanding of how they might turn out.
In
this context the precise definition of "scenario"
is: a tool for ordering one’s perceptions about alternative
future environments in which one’s decisions might be
played out. Alternatively: a set of organised ways for
us to dream effectively about our own future. Concretely,
they resemble a set of stories, either written out or
often spoken. However, these stories are built around
constructed "plots" that make the significant
elements of the world scene stand out boldly. This approach
is more a disciplined way of thinking than a formal methodology.
I’ve
used scenarios with some of the world’s largest businesses
and government institutions, in starting a small business,
and I’ve used them to make personal decisions about my
diet and health. You could use scenarios to plan a small
business, to choose an education, to look for a job, to
judge an investment, or even to contemplate marriage.
Often, scenarios can help people make better decisions
- usually difficult decisions - that they would otherwise
miss or deny.
Consider,
for example, the crisis overtaking the advertising industry.
Beginning in the early 1980’s, anyone could have looked
ahead and seen the growing popularity of new communication
technologies: cable, TV, videocassettes, and computer-based
media such as electronic mail and the Internet. This technological
change was an irrevocable force, certain to shock the
media industries by draining audiences - and then ad revenues
- from traditional network television. No one could say
exactly when the shock would come, or how it would play
out, but it was clear that, within a matter of years,
ad agencies would find their business either radically
changed, or severely diminished - as had the U.S steel
industry in the early eighties, for example.
While
the changes were certain, their exact form was unclear.
How strong would be the influence of companies such as
Disney, which refused to allow advertising on pre-recorded
video tapes? Which consumers would be most willing to
use new forms of media first? What regulatory pressure
would prevent telephone companies from entering the business
of distributing film and television by wire? What forms
could advertising take ten years hence, and how could
agencies make money at it? What would be the effect of
suddenly popular new communications media, such as fax
machines? A set of scenarios would have described the
range of worlds that might emerge by looking carefully
at important elements of the world in the early 1980s.
In
1987, the shock began to hit. Ad agency profits began
to decline, people found themselves laid off, and more
and more agencies had to haggle over fees with their clients.
Most ad people assumed the crisis was temporary; that
it would be followed by a new status quo. Today, ad agencies
are in yet deeper economic trouble, still hoping for a
turnaround, and still refusing to look at the opportunities
– as well as the pitfalls - in the rise of new technology.
I know this because, along with several other people,
I began work in the late 1980s on a set of scenarios about
the effect of new technologies on the media business.
We found clients from every conceivable segment: a broadcast
network, a telephone company, a movie production studio,
and a consumer products company that place major advertisements.
All but one of the advertising agencies we invited to
join us in the study of its own future weren’t interested.
To judge from our conversations with them, they were afraid
of what they might learn, as if the cost of ignorance
were smaller.
Scenarios
are not predictions. It is simply not possible
to predict the future with certainty. An old Arab proverb
says that, "he who predicts the future lies even
if he tells the truth." Rather, scenarios are vehicles
for helping people learn. Unlike traditional business
forecasting or market research, they present alternative
images of the future; they do not merely extrapolate the
trend of the present. One common trend, for instance,
is the U.S. birthrate. In the early 1970s, it hovered
around 3 million births per year; forecasters at the U.S.
Census Bureau projected that this "trend" would
continue forever. Schools, which had been rushed into
construction during the baby boom of the fifties and early
sixties, were now closed down and sold. Policy makers
did not consider that the birthrate might rise again suddenly.
But a scenario might have considered the likelihood that
original baby boom children, reaching their late thirties,
would suddenly have children of their own. In 1979, the
U.S. birthrate began to rise; it is now over the 4 million
per annum of the fifties. Demographers also failed to
anticipate that immigration would accelerate. To keep
up with the demand, the state of California (which had
been closing schools in the late 1970s) must build a classroom
every day for the next seven years.
Often,
managers prefer the illusion of certainty to understanding
risks and realities. If the forecaster fails in his task,
how can the manager be blamed? But in the long run, this
denial of uncertainty sets the stage for surprises, shattering
the manager’s confidence in his or her ability to look
ahead. Scenarios allow a manager to say, "I am prepared
for what ever happens." It is this ability to
act with a knowledgeable sense of risk and reward that
separates both the business executive and the wise individual
from a bureaucrat or a gambler.

|