|
Gary
Kasparov was not beaten by a machine. He was beaten by
a team of IBM employees who took patterns so seriously
that they invested several years and millions of dollars
to build a machine that could recognize and manipulate
all of the patterns that they had learned.
The
IBM team had three advantages which ensured that it was
only a matter of time before Deep Blue won:
The
real contest (learning and applying patterns) was
played out between dozens of very smart individuals
vs. one genius, long before the physical contest occurred.
In the long run, bet on the team.
The IBM team approached patterns with incredible discipline.
They cataloged and set up relationships between every
pattern that matters in chess – even Kasparov-specific
patterns.
The IBM team used computing power – which never forgets
a pattern and is fast enough to review all necessary
patterns before the next move – to create cumulative
learning.
In
the end, Kasparov found himself facing a far more dangerous
foe than he had anticipated. He knew it, and his tirades
at the end of several games betrayed his frustration.
Deep
Blue’s victory was not a case of machine over man. It
was a case of teamwork, of systematic dedication to knowing
patterns, and of cumulative learning, over genius. It
was a human victory. And it was a parable for business
managers and investors everywhere.
PATTERN
THINKING APPLIED TO BUSINESS STRATEGY
Deep
Blue’s victory was an event that provides a window on
the future to every senior manager and investor. With
a little imagination, we can see how the IBM chess experience
is an early indicator of a critical tool that we will
use to do business and investment strategy in the future.
We
propose that any company that makes a pattern investment
similar in direction (not in cost) to that of the IBM
chess team – a combination of management teamwork, systematic
pattern development, and cumulative learning – will generate
superior innovative strategies, and superior sustained
long-term returns. This book aims to help any company
jump-start the development of its own database of patterns,
thus minimizing both investment and time to payback.
An
investment in patterns can empower executives to win in
the game of business where – unlike chess – the rivalry
never ends. For at the heart of business strategy is pattern
recognition. Patterns of how the game has unfolded to
date, where it stands today, and where the game is headed.
Masters
of business pattern recognition are accustomed to staring
at what looks to the newcomer like chaos. Instead of seeing
chaos, they see the strategic picture unfolding within
the complexity, and discover the pattern behind it all.
They "get it."
"Getting
it" is all-important. It is like putting on infrared
vision goggles on a cloudy, moonless night. It helps you
see danger three moves early. It helps you see where the
pathway to opportunity lies, and what moves and combinations
will turn the game in your favor.
"Not
getting it" has all the opposite effects. Blindness
to danger, blindness to opportunity, playing the game
on the run, reacting rather than creating.
That
is why those who know the power of pattern recognition
in business play so intensely and study so hard. Those
who "get it" use their experiences to build
their strategic skills and raise their game to the next
level. Those who don’t "get it" lose and fall
further behind.
PATTERNS
ARE NOT A NEW PHENOMENON
The
good news is that all business people are already engaged
in pattern thinking. From CEOs to middle managers to securities
analysts, we already traffic in patterns as basic tools
of our work and our strategic thinking.
Many
managers can describe and apply the "consolidation
and shakeout" pattern. Many can articulate the characteristics
and consequences of the "commoditization" pattern,
the "disintermediation" pattern, or the "deregulation"
pattern.
Similarly,
most players can recognise the "power shift"
pattern as power moves from manufacturer to distribution
channel. They’ve seen it with Wal-Mart, Home Depot, and
Toys "R" Us. They can anticipate what is likely
to happen with CarMax, AutoNation, or Amazon.com.
Strategic
patterns are neither new nor mysterious. We use them all
the time. They are a critical shortcut for capturing and
highlighting the essential economic characteristics of
a complex, changing picture.
Compared
to the late 1980s, the number and complexity of the patterns
required to know and understand business have grown. Back
then, we all operated, explicitly or implicitly, with
a dozen or so strategic patterns at our fingertips. Today,
we need to know several times as many. And what we have
to know about them, particularly about buyer behaviour
and how profit really happens, implies a more detailed
and nuanced understanding than was sufficient for effective
performance ten years ago.
PATTERN
PROLIFERATION- AND IMPORTANCE- IS INCREASING
For
most of the twentieth century, the idea of understanding
value patterns was irrelevant. Things did not change very
quickly. Everyone knew the fundamental formulas for success,
because the formulas were straightforward in nature.
In
manufacturing, the key pattern to understand was that
profit was a function of relative market share. The strategic
tools and thought technology needed for this universe
where straightforward and extremely useful. The growth/share
matrix, the experience curve, Total Quality Management,
and a solid knowledge of core competencies all served
us well. Many manufacturers became experts at playing
the relative market share game.
But
today, we see more and more contradictions to these rules,
such as smaller automakers being consistently more profitable
than much larger automakers, or Starbucks being more profitable
than much larger coffee companies. We are not even surprised
at the idea that Dell is the most valuable PC maker, even
though it doesn’t manufacture its own core products –
paying a point or two more to outsource key components
because its overall business design saves ten extra points
of cost in the way it goes to market.
In
retail, another simple pattern reigned: location, location,
location. Location closest to home, location in the best
shopping malls. In that world, there where no destination
superstores, no e-commerce, no kiosks, almost no branded
retail, and no "entertainment-while-shopping"
to confuse our thinking.
Services
also had their own pattern. Good service meant personalized
service by someone you knew, someone who called you by
name, someone who put a personal touch in to everything
they did. In that world, there was no remote service,
no 24-hour, seven-day-a-week service, no self-service
for a lower price, no service via an intelligent agent.
As
the above examples begin to show, knowledge of traditional
patterns is no longer adequate. The modes of analysis
that developed them – linear, logical, two-dimensional,
bottom-up - also don’t work. Even worse, they can fail
in spectacular fashion. Traditional market share leaders
doing traditional strategic analysis donated $7 000 billion
in shareholder value to newcomers in the past decade and
a half.
Traditional
patterns are not always wrong – they are just no longer
right all the time. They should be treated as one value
pattern of many, not as our North Star or our compass.
There are now many other patterns that supplement them
and that explain much of the new value creation in business
today. There are companies that break the old rules to
their benefits, and in doing so create new rules that
can be exploited by others via pattern thinking.
PATTERNS
AND LEADERSHIP
Most
science fiction fans are familiar with the light-speed
travel depicted in movies such as Star Wars and
Star Trek. With the flick of a button, our hero’s
spaceship hurtles into hyperspace and escapes from the
clutches of the enemy. The audience sees an incredible
stream of light rushing past. Viewers’ visual and auditory
sense are flooded with an overload of impressions.
Any
diligent reader of the current business press will also
experience a sensory excess, a broad stream of data rushing
at us at Mach 2. The psychological effects are confusion,
overload, and chaos. Managers today face hyperspace without
a map. New and old customers are changing their priorities.
New business designs are emerging from all angles, and
old competitors are resurfacing as challengers in entirely
new ways. Thousands of "inputs" crowd into managers’
decision process, and they have no way to parse them to
find the most useful nuggets.
Input
overload can lead to chaos in our organization, a sense
that everything is changing around us, but a lack of clarity
about what to do next. Such chaos is typically a prelude
to failure, to shareholder value destruction, and to a
black mark on an otherwise successful management career.
Strategic
pattern recognition is all about navigating through the
on rushing hyperspace (how the world presents itself to
us) and working to see the patterns underneath the surface
noise. If these skills are gained soon enough, they can
help us to make better decisions and take more effective
actions. The flood of information can overwhelm decision
making. Seeing patterns – superimposing a structure on
the chaos – allows us to map the landscape and direct
our strategy towards the most profitable opportunities.
Pattern
thinking is a manager’s best tool for communicating as
well as making sense of chaotic change. Via patterns,
management can communicate to others that it has a grasp
on how to turn change into opportunity, that it is worthy
of employee and investor trust. Establishing such a leadership
profile can pay handsome dividends in retaining critical
talent and investor enthusiasm.
To
those who work for, invest in, or buy from a company,
the flood of information can feel even worse. These players
must have less direct control over the situation than
the manager does. In these cases, pattern thinking is
even more important. Understanding the key strategic patterns
playing out in an industry can help investors, customers,
and employees making more informed decisions and more
astute choices.
HOW
STRONG IS YOUR PATTERN GAME?
It’s
1999. It’s your industry. Does your company "get
it" or not?
Get
what?
The
patterns of change that describe how the strategic landscape
is deforming itself from yesterday’s topology into tomorrow’s.
The patterns that describe which business design are becoming
economically obsolete. The patterns that describe which
business designs are becoming customer – relevant – even
customer – compelling – and extremely profitable.
There
are dozen examples of "getting it" and "not
getting it." Those described in Chapters 4 – 11 are
but a few. In each case, several very specific, well –
defined patterns were unfolding. Some players "got
it," while others did not. "Getting it"
allowed the winners to make the strategic decisions that
tapped into the enormous economic energy released by the
patterns. Those who didn’t "get it" – who didn’t
see the patterns – failed to make the right moves and
destroyed enormous shareholder value as a result.
How
was Nokia able to exploit the "product to solutions"
and "product to brand" patterns in order to
surpass Motorola and Ericsson as the leading innovator
and value creator in wireless communications? What did
the founder of SAP "see" years earlier than
its established competitors that enabled them to anticipate
and take advantage of the "knowledge to products"
pattern? How did two consultants foresee that the "product
to customer knowledge" pattern would transform the
credit card business, and how did they craft a business
design that allowed Capital One to become a financial
services powerhouse? How did Bang & Olufsen alter
its business design to capitalize on the "product
to brand" and customer redefinition patterns? We
will explore the answers to these questions in Chapters
4-11.
Unfortunately,
hindsight is 20/20. In order to succeed, a company must
"get it" before the competition, not
years later. In case after case, those companies that
"got it" earlier than the competition have created
the most valued growth and the greatest degree of strategic
control in their business.
In
your industry today, there are probably between two and
five discrete patterns playing out. Shifts from old profit
sources to new. Shifts from old business models to new.
Does your company "get it?" Do you see and understand
the patterns? Can you anticipate how the patterns will
unfold to create opportunities and threats? Do your competitors
"get it?" Which of you is responding more quickly
and accurately to exploit the unfolding patterns of customer
and economic change?
PATTERNS
AND PROGRESS
Learning
patterns and using them to create sustained profit growth
will not happen without effort. As in chess, one does
not become a grand master overnight. However, the early
learning rate is very, very high, and mastery of the basic
rules leads to dramatic performance improvements in a
short period of time.
Patterns
might seem like a daunting subject to tackle to the reader
just starting this book. But it is worth remembering that
pattern recognition is an approach that has been applied
in many fields to anticipate uncertain futures. Among
them are:
Seismography Where’s
the oil going to be?
Meteorology What’s
the weather going to be?
Medical
diagnostics How is the patient going to be?
When
we systematically exploit pattern recognition technology
in business strategy, this is the challenge we face:
Business
strategy Where’s the value going to be?
Sorting
through the vast data flow from the evolving business
landscape is a task very similar to anticipating the weather
or approximating the location of oil reserves. Meteorologists
and sonar experts work with powerful computer programs
that apply patterns to the current data set. As business
strategists, we must apply the pattern-trained thinking
of our management teams. The human mind is capable of
accomplishing this activity effectively. Strategic pattern
recognition is a skill that can be learned, but requires
a different way of thinking than we’ve been accustomed
to, and a different way of building experience.
By
investing to learn strategic pattern recognition, you will
acquire the basic skills necessary to discern the most important
patterns and their implications for the new game of business.
With this new skill set, you will be better able to map
out a profitable course for your unit or your company in
spite of a seemingly chaotic corporate landscape. In fact,
superior pattern recognition skills will help you to transform
this apparent chaos from a liability to a distinct advantage
in the next business game you play.
|